Search versus Decision for Election Manipulation Problems
نویسندگان
چکیده
Most theoretical definitions about the complexity of manipulating elections focus on the decision problem of recognizing which instances can be successfully manipulated, rather than the search problem of finding the successful manipulative actions. Since the latter is a far more natural goal for manipulators, that definitional focus may be misguided if these two complexities can differ. Our main result is that they probably do differ: If integer factoring is hard, then for election manipulation, election bribery, and some types of election control, there are election systems for which recognizing which instances can be successfully manipulated is in polynomial time but producing the successful manipulations cannot be done in polynomial time.
منابع مشابه
Search versus Decision for Election Manipulation
Most theoretical definitions about the complexity of manipulating elections focus on the decision problem of recognizing which instances can be successfully manipulated, rather than the search problem of finding the successful manipulative actions. Since the latter is a far more natural goal for manipulators, that definitional focus may be misguided if these two complexities can differ. Our mai...
متن کاملSolving election manipulation using integer partitioning problems
An interesting problem of multi-agent systems is that of voting, in which the preferences of autonomous agents are to be combined. Applications of voting include modeling social structures, search engine ranking, and choosing a leader among computational agents. In the setting of voting, it is very important that each agent presents truthful information about his or her preferences, and not man...
متن کاملX THEN X: Manipulation of Same-System Runoff Elections
Do runoff elections, using the same voting rule as the initial election but just on the winning candidates, increase or decrease the complexity of manipulation? Does allowing revoting in the runoff increase or decrease the complexity relative to just having a runoff without revoting? We show that, for both weighted and unweighted voting, every possible answer can be made to hold, even for elect...
متن کاملRealistic Assumptions for Attacks on Elections
We must properly model attacks and the preferences of the electorate for the computational study of attacks on elections to give us insight into the hardness of attacks in practice. Theoretical and empirical analysis are equally important methods to understand election attacks. I discuss my recent work on domain restrictions on partial preferences and on new election attacks. I propose further ...
متن کاملDetecting Possible Manipulators in Elections
Manipulation is a problem of fundamental importance in the context of voting in which the voters exercise their votes strategically instead of voting honestly to prevent selection of an alternative that is less preferred. The GibbardSatterthwaite theorem shows that there is no strategy-proof voting rule that simultaneously satisfies certain combinations of desirable properties. Researchers have...
متن کامل